Aarts, F. 1993. Who, whom, that, and 0 in two corpora of spoken English. English Today 9:19-21.
Adamson, H. D. 1992. Social and Processing Constraints on Relative Clauses. American Speech . 67 (2). Duke University Press.
Bakovic, Eric and Edward Keer. To appear. Optionality and Ineffability. Optimality Theoretic Syntax. Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw and Sten Vikener (eds.).
Ball, C. 1994. Relative pronouns in it-clefts: The last seven centuries. Language Variation and Change 6:179-200.
Ball, C. 1996. A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change 8(2):227-258.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson Education Limited.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. That’s that. Mouton: The Hague.
Boskovic, Zeljko and Howard Lasnik. 2003. On the Distribution of Null Complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry: 34 (4), 527-546.
Cacoullos, Rena Torres and James A. Walker. 2003. Taking a Complement… Variably. Presented at NWAVE 32. Philadelphia, PA.
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill and Ann Williams. 2005. Manuscript. On the non-convergence of phonology, grammar, and discourse.
Cofer, Thomas Michael. 1972. Linguistic Variability in a Philadelphia Speech Community. University of Pennsylvania, dissertation.
Cofer, T. 1975. Performance constraints on relative pronoun deletion. Linguistics 157:13-32.
Dekeyser, X. 1984. Relativi[z]ers in Early Modern English: A dynamic quantitative study. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 61-87.
Dekeyser, X. 1986. English contact clauses revisited: A diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica Historica 7:107-120.
Dekeyser, X. 1988. Preposition stranding and relative complementiser deletion: Implicational tendencies in English and other Germanic languages. Papers. Ed. Adamson et al., 87-109.
Dor, Daniel. 1995. Representations, Attitudes and Factivity Evaluations: an epistemically-based analysis of lexical selection. PhD Thesis, Stanford University.
Elsness, J. 1984. That or Zero? A Look at the Choice of Object Clause Connective in a Corpus of American English. English Studies 65.
Fanego, Teresa. 1990. Finite Complement Clauses in Shakespeare’s English. I. Studia Neophilologica 62: 3-21.
Ferreira, Victor S. and Gary S. Dell. 2000. Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production. Cognitive Psychology 40, 296-340.
Fowler, H. W. 1954 A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford P.
Fox, B. A. and Thompson, S. A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66:297-316.
Francis, W. Nelson. 1958. The Structure of American English. The Ronald Press Company: New York.
Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1940. American English Grammar. D. Appleton-Century Company: New York.
Geisler, C. 2002. Relativization in Ulster English. In P. Poussa (ed.), Relativization on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa. 135-146.
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 1-76.
Grodner, Daniel, Edward Gibson, and Susanne Tunstall. 2002. Syntactic Complexity in Ambiguity Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 267-295.
Guy, G. R., and Bayley, R. 1995. On the choice of relative pronouns in English. American Speech 70:148-162.
Hiroe, Akira. 1999. Mood and Complementizer Deletion. English Linguistics 16:1, 55-77.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge UP.
Ihalainen, O. 1980. Relative clauses in the dialect of Somerset. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 81:187-196
Jaeger, T.F. and Tom Wasow. 2005. The role of referential accessibility hierarchies in language production. BLS 31.
Kaltenbock, Gunther. 2004. That or no that? – that is the question: on subordinator suppression in extraposed subject clauses. Vienna Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 13.1.
Kawagushi, Chihiro. 2001. The Change of Use of the that complementizer in that-Clauses during the Thirty Years between the Early 1960s and the Early 1990s – A Study Based on Brown, LOB, Frown and FLOB Corpora. Studies in English Corpus Linguistics 2. Edited by Toshio Saito and Yamazaki Shunji. Dept. of English, Daito Bunka University: Tokyo.
Kikai, A., Shleppegrell, M., and Tagliamonte, S. 1987. The influence of syntactic position on relativization strategies. In K. M. Dennin, S. Inkelas, F. C. McNair-Knox, and J. R. Rickford (eds.), Variation in Language:NWAV-XV at Stanford. Department of Linguistics. Stanford: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University. 266-277.
Kruisinga, E. and P.A. Erades. 1953. An English Grammar. Volume I: Accidence and Syntax, First Part. P. Noordhoff N.V.: Groningen.
Lopez Couso, Maria Jose. 1996. A Look at That/Zero Variation in Restoration English. English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8 ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994). Edited by Derek Britton. John Benjamins.
McDavid, Virginia. 1964. The Alternation of “That” and Zero in Noun Clauses. American Speech 39 (2), 102-113.
Mizumura, Tomoko. 2001. Retention vs. Omission of the That Complementizer in British and American English – A Study Based on the Brown, LOB, Frown and FLOB Corpora. Studies in English Corpus Linguistics 2. Edited by Toshio Saito and Yamazaki Shunji. Dept. of English, Daito Bunka University: Tokyo.
Montgomery, M. B. 1989. The standardization of English relative clauses. InJ. B. Trahern (ed.), Standardizing English: Essays in the history of language change, in Honor of John Hurt Fisher. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. 111-138.
Moralejo-Garate, Teresa. 2000. That/Zero Variation in an Early Modern English Corpus of Private and Non-Private Letters. Southwest Journal of Linguistics. Linguistic Association of the Southwest.
Nagamine, Toshinobu. 2002. A Preliminary Corpus-Based Study on Genre-Specific Features in Restrictive Relative Clauses. Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 1, No. 3.
Nevalainen, T. and Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2002. The rise of relative who in Early Modern English. In P. Poussa (ed.), Relativisation on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa 109-121.
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Edited by Timothy Shopen. Cambridge UP: London.
Olofsson, Arne. 1981. Relative Junctions in Written American English. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis: Goteborg, Sweden.
Otsu, Norihiko. 2002. On the Absence of the Conjunction That in Late Middle English. Language and Computers. 38 (1), 225-234.
Peet, W. 1974. Omission of subject relative pronouns in Hawaiian English restrictive relative clauses. In R. W. Shuy and C.-J. N. Bailey (eds.), Towards tomorrow's linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 253-266.
Peitsara, K. 2002. Relativizers in the Suffolk dialect. In P. Poussa (ed.), Relativisation on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa. 167-180.
Poussa, P. 1985. Historical implications of the distribution of the zero-pronoun relative clause in Modern English dialects: Looking backwards towards OE from MapS5 of the linguistic atlas of England. In S. Jacobson (ed.), Papers from the third Scandinavian symposium on syntactic variation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 99-117.
Poussa, P. M. 1993. Relativization and settlement history in North Norfolk. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Sheffield.
Quirk, R. 1957. Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies 38:97-109.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Seminar Press: New York.
Ransom, Evelyn. 1986. Complementation: Its Meanings and Forms. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Rissanen, M. 1984. The choice of relative pronouns in 17th century American English. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 417-435.
Rissanen, Matti. 1991. On the history of that/zero as object clause links in English. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. Edited by Aijmer, K. and B. Altenberg. 272-289. London: Longman.
Roland, Douglas W., Jeffrey L. Elman, and Victor S. Ferreira. 2003. Why that? Predicting that presence and ambiguity resolution. Poster Presentation, Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing 2003, Glasgow, Scotland.
--. In press. Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition.
Sanders, D. 2002. Family dynamics: The behavior of relatives in contemporary standard spoken English. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of York.
Sigley, Robert. 1997. The influence of formality and channel on relative pronoun choice in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics. Vol. 1, No. 2. 207-232.
--. 1998. Interpreting social variation using stylistic continua: the strange case of relativiser choice. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 10. 64-103.
--. 2003. The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change. Vol. 15, 227-253.
Shnukal, A. 1981. There's a lot mightn't believe this...Variable subject relative pronoun absence in Australian English. IN D. Sankoff and H. R. Cedergren (eds.), Variation Omnibus. Edmonton: Linguistic REsearch. 321-328.
Tagliamonte, S. A. 2002. Variation and Change in the British relative marker system. In P. Poussa (ed.), Relativisation on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa. 147-165.
Tagliamonte, Sali, Helen Lawrence, and Jennifer Smith. 2003. That or no that in English dialect corpora: Grammaticalization, frequency and complexity in the emergence of grammar. Presented at NWAVE 32 in Philadelphia, PA.
Tagliamonte, Sali, Jennifer Smith and Helen Lawrence. 2005. No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain. Language Variation and Change 17 (1). 75- 112.
Tagliamonte, S. A. and Smith, J. To appear. No momentary fancy! The zero 'complementizer' in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15 237-251.
Tottie, G. 1995. The man 0 I love: An analysis of factors favouring zero relatives in written British and American English. In G. Melchers and B. Warren (eds.), Studies in Anglistics.Stockholm:Almqvist and Wiksell. 201-215.
Tottie, G. 1997. Relatively speaking: Relative marker usage in the British National Corpus. In T. Nevalainen and L. Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique. 465-481.
Tottie, G. and Harvie, D. 2000. It's all relative: Relativization strategies in early African American English. IN S. Poplack (ed.), The English history of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell. 198-230.
Tottie, G. and Rey, M. 1997. Relativization strategies in Earlier African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 9(2):219-247.
Van den Eynden, N. 1993. Syntactic variation and unconscious linguistic change: A study of adjectival relative clauses in the dialect of Dorset. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Van den Eynden Morpeth, N., and Hogeschool, L. 2002. Relativisers in the Southwest of England. In P. Poussa (ed.), Relativisation on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa. 181-194.
Walter, Mary Ann and T. Florian Jaeger. To appear. Constraints on complementizer/relativizer drop: A strong lexical OCP effect of that. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.
Yaguchi, Michiko. 2001. The function of the non-deictic that in English. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1125-1155.
Zwicky, Ann D. and Arnold M. Zwicky. 1986. The Thing Is, Some That’s Aren’t There at All. American Speech 61 (2) 182-183.